Conférence
Notice
Langue :
Anglais
Crédits
Michel Marre (Intervention), Ronan Roussel (Intervention)
Conditions d'utilisation
Droit commun de la propriété intellectuelle
DOI : 10.60527/rrn5-gs75
Citer cette ressource :
Michel Marre, Ronan Roussel. Canal-U-Médecine. (2012, 1 décembre). Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists (CVCT) Forum - Paris 2012 : Study drug and background therapy : on top of or vs. Metformin? The issue of background therapy and comparator , in CVCT 9th Global Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists Forum • Paris 2012. [Vidéo]. Canal-U. https://doi.org/10.60527/rrn5-gs75. (Consultée le 12 juillet 2025)
Logo Canal-U/Médecine
Canal-U/Médecine
S'abonner
Contacter

Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists (CVCT) Forum - Paris 2012 : Study drug and background therapy : on top of or vs. Metformin? The issue of background therapy and comparator

Réalisation : 1 décembre 2012 - Mise en ligne : 11 décembre 2012
  • document 1 document 2 document 3
  • niveau 1 niveau 2 niveau 3
Descriptif

Title : Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists (CVCT) Forum - Paris 2012 :
Study drug and background therapy : on top of or vs. Metformin? The issue of background therapy and comparator
Speaker: Michel MARRE, Paris, FRA, Ronan ROUSSEL, Paris, FRA
Abstract : Study drug and background therapy : on top of or vs. Metformin? The issue of background therapy and comparator
L’auteur n’a pas transmis de conflit d’intérêt concernant les données diffusées dans cette vidéo ou publiées dans la référence citée.
Conférence enregistrée : 9th Global Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists Forum • Paris 2012
Diabetes clinical trials : helped or hindered by the current shift in regulatory requirements? Glycaemic control is an inadequate surrogate marker of cardiovascular event reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clinical trials to date have been unsuccessful in identifying a therapeutic approach that addresses the underlying problem in diabetes (glycaemic control) and reduces cardiovascular risk. The potential for some agents to increase the risk of cardiovascular events has led to substantial changes in regulatory requirements for new anti-diabetic therapies. These requirements, while key to ensuring the cardiovascular safety of new agents, fail to emphasize the need to show clinical benefits, such as less visual impairment, less need for dialysis, or fewer cardiovascular events and deaths. Changes in test results such as glycaemic control, serum creatinine, micro-albuminuria, or retinopathy are inadequate surrogates. Regulators should consider the potential advantages of offering extended patent protection in order to encourage companies to conduct long-term trials in diabetes and many other chronic medical conditions. Cooperative efforts among physicians, clinical trialists, regulators, and sponsors are needed to address unresolved issues including re-defining therapeutic targets that are meaningful to patients with diabetes, determining the appropriate length of follow-up for future trials, and considering the ethical and operational challenges of non-inferiority designs.
Chairpersons: Marc PFEFFER, Boston, USA - Kausik RAY, London, GBR
Réalisation, production : Canal U/3S et CERIMES
Keyword : Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists, Paris, 2012, Cardiovascular prevention, Baro-stimulation, diabetes

Intervention
Thème
Disciplines :
Documentation
programme et résumés

Dans la même collection

Voir tout

Avec les mêmes intervenants et intervenantes