What’s Special About Genes? Causal Specificity, Information, and Genetic
- document 1 document 2 document 3
- niveau 1 niveau 2 niveau 3
- audio 1 audio 2 audio 3
Descriptif
Philosophers of biology have recently been debating to what extent such nucleic acids that are said to carry genetic information (i.e., DNA or mRNA) really play a special role in development. A recent attempt to defend such a special role consists in arguing that nucleic acid is what makes an actual difference (as opposed to potential differences) to the amino acid sequence of proteins. However, this is not sufficient as there are often other actual-difference makers involved in protein synthesis, for example, splicing or post-translational modification mechanisms. For this reasons, it has been suggested that what distinguishes nucleic acid is their causal specificity. Causal specificity has to do with the amount of control that interventions on the cause variable can exert on the effect variable. However, a quantitative measure of causal specificity can be used to show that in many cases the specificity of non-genetic causes is a full match to the genetic causes.
In this talk, Marcel Weber argue that what matters biologically is the causal specificity that inheres in possible interventions that are biologically normal, where biological normality is defined both in terms of what can happen in a population of organisms at a non-negligible probability and what is consistent with normal biological functioning of the rest of the organism. This kind of causal specificity is higher for genetic causes than for the (known) non-genetic causes.
Thèmes
Notice
Dans la même collection
-
Philosophy of Science / Elliott SoberSoberElliott
Elliott Sober est philosophe de la biologie à l’Université du Wisconsin. Dans cette interview avec Thomas Pradeu, il récapitule son parcours et présente sa vision de la contribution de la
-
The cell as an elementary organism: from Schwann to Brücke and KöllikerDuchesneauFrançois
This presentation is about the way cell physiology (Cellular physiologie) was born. Indeed, Schwann invented the cell theory in 1839, but his views on the cell were rapidly challenged and transformed
-
What does a ‘global history’ of biology bring to us ?MorangeMichel
To write a global history of life sciences from Antiquity to extant research, from molecular biology to ecology and ethology is an impossible task, the promise to be inaccurate and wrong in many
-
Host-Microbiota Symbiosis: One, Many, or Mega-Organism? Lessons from Internalism vs. Externalism de…ChiuLynn
I will distinguish between three types of interactionist reactions to internalist or externalist theories. These theories assign specific theoretical roles to internal and external factors,
-
Why Philosophy of Microbiology ?O'MalleyMaureen A.
Microbes have only recently become the objects of sustained philosophical attention. Some of the reasons why philosophers now find microbes and microbiology interesting, and why philosophy of
-
From the question “what is life?” to the building of minimal cells
For many centuries, the question about the meaning and nature of life has been central in philosophy and science. We have now gathered, through experimental approaches, a large body of knowledge
-
Self and non-self in fungiSaupeSvenPaolettiMathieuVisentinJonathan
>> Sven Saupe : Self, identity, fungi The notion of self is a rich but ambiguous concept that is used in a wide array of academic disciplines including immunology, psychology and philosophy (in
-
Nietzsche's notion of HealthGemesKenBikfalviAndreas
It is widely known that Nietzsche take himself to present a tremendous challenge to conventional morality. Many of his interpreters have been exorcised in trying to make precise the nature of that
Sur le même thème
-
What does a ‘global history’ of biology bring to us ?MorangeMichel
To write a global history of life sciences from Antiquity to extant research, from molecular biology to ecology and ethology is an impossible task, the promise to be inaccurate and wrong in many
-
Host-Microbiota Symbiosis: One, Many, or Mega-Organism? Lessons from Internalism vs. Externalism de…ChiuLynn
I will distinguish between three types of interactionist reactions to internalist or externalist theories. These theories assign specific theoretical roles to internal and external factors,
-
Why Philosophy of Microbiology ?O'MalleyMaureen A.
Microbes have only recently become the objects of sustained philosophical attention. Some of the reasons why philosophers now find microbes and microbiology interesting, and why philosophy of
-
From the question “what is life?” to the building of minimal cells
For many centuries, the question about the meaning and nature of life has been central in philosophy and science. We have now gathered, through experimental approaches, a large body of knowledge
-
Self and non-self in fungiSaupeSvenPaolettiMathieuVisentinJonathan
>> Sven Saupe : Self, identity, fungi The notion of self is a rich but ambiguous concept that is used in a wide array of academic disciplines including immunology, psychology and philosophy (in