- Date de réalisation : 7 Octobre 2020
- Durée du programme : 91 min
- Classification Dewey : Protection de la propriété intellectuelle
- Auteur(s) : GUADAMUZ Andres
Dans la même collectionQui travaille derrière l’intelligence artificielle ? Enjeux éthiques et sociétaux d’une ... Recommandation algorithmique et diversité de l’information : comment analyser l’impact des ... Où en sont les utopies productives ? Plateformes, makers et fabrication distribuée Swimming up the waterfall: Researching the permanence and ephemerality of 4chan/pol/ Les Peer Production Studies : un champ de recherche à construire ? Les Peer Production Studies : un champ de recherche à construire ? discussion
Artificial Intelligence and Copyright: The Way Forward
We are living through a revolution in the production of artistic, literary and musical works that have been generated in some shape or form by artificial intelligence (AI). Take the following paragraph:
“One can have many opinions and still have strong values and morals. The phrase « all opinions are equal » is only the correct one when we understand that no opinion, no matter how stupid or contrary to reality, will ever be given any special place in our discussion. No one has the right to censor you because of your opinions…”
These is a readable text, but it doesn’t make much sense, you may expect it to come from a non-native speaker, or perhaps to be the ramblings of a bored Internet users. However, the text was generated by a language model called GPT-2, developed by Open AI.1 This is just one of the many tools that are being developed that can produce uncanny works that mimic human creativity. Take two other Open AI tools, Musenet and Jukebox. Musenet can produce musical compositions for ten instruments having been trained in classical and popular music; while Jukebox can produce music, lyrics and singing in the style of several artists such as Elvis Presley and Katy Perry.
Other AI-generated works have been widely reported in the press in recent years. For example, the AI painting called Edmond de Belamy made the news when it was sold in an auction for $432,500 USD. The painting was made by the French art collective Obvious using a machine learning algorithm designed specifically to generate images, known as a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN). The artists fed the AI over 15,000 portraits from various epochs, and produced a set of portraits of the fictional Belamy family.
There has been considerable discussion in recent years with regards to the copyright implications of the above increase in the creative capacity of artificial intelligence, and there is no consensus on the legal protection given (or not) to AI works. This presentation will discuss some of the questions, but most importantly will try to look beyond the hype to ask real questions of the viability and reach of AI creative tools, and whether we need to make changes to the law.