-
- Date de réalisation : 20 Juin 2017
- Durée du programme : 20 min
- Classification Dewey : Bilinguisme, multilinguisme
-
- Catégorie : Conférences
- Niveau : niveau Master (LMD), niveau Doctorat (LMD), Recherche
- Disciplines : Linguistique, Disciplines connexes (sociolinguistique, psycholinguistique…)
- Collections : Bilinguisme contre monolinguisme : une nouvelle perspective sur les limites de l'acquisition de L2
- ficheLom : Voir la fiche LOM
-
- Auteur(s) : STOEHR Antje
- producteur : Université Toulouse-Jean Jaurès-campus Mirail
- Réalisateur(s) : SARAZIN Claire
- Editeur : SCPAM / Université Toulouse-Jean Jaurès-campus Mirail
-
- Langue : Anglais
- Mots-clés : bilinguisme chez l'enfant
- Conditions d’utilisation / Copyright : Tous droits réservés aux auteurs et à l'Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès.

Cross-linguistic influence at the feature-level ? Evidence from Dutch-German bilingual preschoolers. How bilinguals are more monolingual-like than assumed / Antje Stoehr
Dans la même collection



















Cross-linguistic influence at the feature-level ? Evidence from Dutch-German bilingual preschoolers. How bilinguals are more monolingual-like than assumed / Antje Stoehr
Cross-linguistic influence at the feature-level ? Evidence from Dutch-German bilingual preschoolers. How bilinguals are more monolingual-like than assumed / Antje Stoehr, in colloque "Bilingualism vs. monolingualism: a new perspective on limitations to L2 acquisition" organisé par le laboratoire Octogone-Lordat (Université Toulouse 2) sous la responsabilité de Barbara Köpke (UT2J), Holger Hopp (Technische Universität Braunschweig), Tanja Kupisch (Universität Konstanz), Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, 19-20 juin 2017.
VOT production of bilingual children renders support
for cross-linguistic influence (CLI) between a bilingual’s two languages, but
it remains unclear whether CLI operates between phonemes or features (e.g.,
Fabiano-Smith & Bunta, 2012; Kehoe, Lleó & Rakow, 2004). The present
study addresses this question with VOT production of bilingual preschoolers who
speak German as a heritage language in the Netherlands.
Dutch and German differ in the phonetic
implementation of the voicing contrast: German contrasts short lag ‘voiced’
plosives with aspirated ‘voiceless’ plosives at labial, coronal, and dorsal
places of articulation (/b/, /d/, /g/ vs. /p/, /t/, /k/).
Dutch contrasts prevoiced ‘voiced’ plosives with short lag ‘voiceless’ plosives
only at labial and coronal places of articulation (/b/, /d/ vs. /p/, /t/, /k/),
but lacks the ‘voiced’ dorsal plosive /g/.
CLI causes bilingual children to prevoice German /b/
and /d/ more frequently than monolinguals (Stoehr, Benders, van Hell &
Fikkert, in press). The production of /g/
in German offers a unique possibility to test whether CLI occurs between
phonemes or features. If CLI operates between phonemes, no production
differences between bilinguals and monolinguals are expected in /g/.
If CLI operates between features, bilinguals should prevoice /g/
more frequently than monolinguals. Furthermore, bilingual children’s production
of German /g/
and /k/ can show whether the absence of a voicing contrast at the dorsal place
of articulation in Dutch delays the acquisition of a voicing contrast in
German.
Twenty-nine Dutch-German simultaneous bilingual
preschoolers (3;7-5;11) and 29 age- matched monolinguals named German /g/-
and /k/-initial nouns in a picture naming paradigm. VOT was measured as the
time interval between burst release and the onset of vocal fold vibration. Data
was analyzed using mixed-effects logistic and mixed-effects linear regression.
Bilingual children prevoiced /g/ more frequently than
monolinguals (β=-0.81,
SE=0.38, z=- 2.11, p=.035). Yet, both groups devoiced the majority of /g/
tokens, and maintained a clear contrast between devoiced /g/
and /k/ (β=22.70,
SE=2.62, t=8.67, p
commentaires
Ajouter un commentaire Lire les commentaires