Cours/Séminaire
Chapitres
Notice
Lieu de réalisation
CNRS POUCHET
Langue :
Anglais
Crédits
Jean René BORELLY (Production), Andrea Matwyshyn (Intervention)
Conditions d'utilisation
CC BY 3.0 FR : http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/fr/
DOI : 10.60527/2mpn-yg40
Citer cette ressource :
Andrea Matwyshyn. CNRS_Pouchet. (2019, 12 novembre). The Internet of (Artificially Intelligent) Bodies Part 2 , in Séminaire du CIS. [Vidéo]. Canal-U. https://doi.org/10.60527/2mpn-yg40. (Consultée le 18 septembre 2024)
Site Pouchet du CNRS
Site Pouchet CNRS
S'abonner
Contacter

The Internet of (Artificially Intelligent) Bodies Part 2

Réalisation : 12 novembre 2019 - Mise en ligne : 30 janvier 2020
  • document 1 document 2 document 3
  • niveau 1 niveau 2 niveau 3
Descriptif

ANDREA MATWYSHYN

 The Internet of (Artificially Intelligent) Bodies

This talk introduces the ongoing progression of the Internet of Things (IoT) into the Internet of Bodies (IoB)—a network of human bodies whose integrity and functionality rely at least in part on the Internet and related technologies, such as artificial intelligence. IoB devices will evidence the same categories of legacy security flaws that have plagued IoT devices. However, unlike most IoT, IoB technologies will directly, physically harm human bodies—a set of harms courts, legislators, and regulators will deem worthy of legal redress. As such, IoB will herald the arrival of (some forms of) corporate software liability and a new legal and policy battle over the integrity of the human body and mind. Yet, the challenges of IoB are not purely legal in nature. The social integration of IoB will also not be seamless. As bits and bodies meld and as human flesh becomes permanently entwined with hardware, software, and algorithms, IoB will test our norms and values as a society. In particular, it will challenge notions of human autonomy and self-governance. Legal scholars have traditionally considered Kantian autonomy as the paradigmatic lens for legal determinations impacting the human body. However, IoB threatens to undermine a fundamental precondition of Kantian autonomy—Kantian heautonomy. Damaged heautonomy renders both Kantian autonomy and deliberative democracy potentially compromised. As such, this talk argues that safeguarding heautonomy should constitute the animating legal principle for governance of IoB bodies. It concludes by offering a sliding scale of “technohumanity” as a framework for the legal and policy discussion of what it means to be “human” in an age where bodies are the “things” connected to the Internet.

 

Intervention
Thème
Discipline :

Dans la même collection

Voir tout

Avec les mêmes intervenants et intervenantes

Sur le même thème