Langue :
Nathalie MICHAUD (Réalisation), Université Toulouse-Jean Jaurès-campus Mirail (Production), SCPAM / Université Toulouse-Jean Jaurès-campus Mirail (Publication), Renata Pedroso de Araujo (Intervention)
Conditions d'utilisation
Tous droits réservés à l'Université Jean-Jaurès et aux auteurs.
Citer cette ressource :
Renata Pedroso de Araujo. UT2J. (2021, 8 mars). Analysis of Artefact Form: the application of morphometric methods to archaeology / Renata Pedroso de Araujo , in 1st Conference for Women Archaeologists and Paleontologists. [Vidéo]. Canal-U. (Consultée le 26 février 2024)

Analysis of Artefact Form: the application of morphometric methods to archaeology / Renata Pedroso de Araujo

Réalisation : 8 mars 2021 - Mise en ligne : 8 mars 2021
  • document 1 document 2 document 3
  • niveau 1 niveau 2 niveau 3

Analysis of Artefact Form: the application of morphometric methods to archaeology / Renata Pedroso de Araujo, in colloque "1st Virtual Conference for Women Archaeologists and Paleontologists. Nouveaux apports à l’étude des populations et environnements passés" organisé par le laboratoire Travaux et Recherches Archéologiques sur les Cultures, les Espaces et les Sociétés (TRACES) de l’Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès et le laboratoire Paléontologie Évolution Paléoécosystèmes (PALEVOPRIM) de l'Université de Poitiers, sous la responsabilité scientifique de Julie Bachellerie, Ana Belén Galán López (Traces), Émilie Berlioz et Margot Louail (Palevoprim). Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, 8-9 mars 2021. [Conférence enregistrée à distance].Session 3 : Exploitation of natural resources and raw materials, subsistence strategies.

This presentation will verse on the subject andmethods used in my doctoral research project. I am currently developingresearch in Brazilian archaeology, with a project aiming to contribute to theunderstanding of the occupation processes of southeastern Brazil byhunter-gatherer groups during the Holocene. More specifically, this researchfocusses on the State of São Paulo, concentrating on the study of two classesof formal lithic artefacts, namely bifacial projectile points and unifacial,plane-convex scrapers. The scope of the research is to characterize thediversity of the southeastern Brazilian lithic industries by means of amorphometric approach, in order to explore the differences or similarities inthe 2 characteristics of bifacial points and unifacial artefacts of São Pauloterritory in relation to these same artefact classes found in the south (UmbuTradition, with bifacial points) and in the midwest and part of the northeastof the country (Itaparica Tradition, with unifacial artefacts). These data willbe theoretically interpreted in light of the assumptions of CulturalTransmission Theory, aiming the proposal of hypotheses related to the scenariosof regional settlement, territory delineation and cultural contact, andrelating these scenarios to the population dynamics of these human groupsthroughout the Holocene. The endeavors for application of morphometric methodsto the morphological analysis of material culture is fairly new –a little morethan a decade– and it has been gaining more interest among archaeologists asan effective, quantitative and complementary approach to the more disseminatedtechnological analyses, mainly regarding lithic artefacts. This project has notyielded research results so far, so the idea for this occasion is to presentresults of recent morphometric works applied to lithic studies in Brazil and tointroduce the morphometric approach as a promising method of analysis inarchaeological studies.


ADAMS, D.C., ROHLF, F.J. & Slice, D.E. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics: Ten Years of Progress Following the ‘Revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology 71, 5–16.

ADAMS, D.C., ROHLF, F.J. & Slice, D.E. 2013. A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix, 24(1), 7.

BENÍTEZ, H. A. & PÜSCHEL, T. A. 2014. Modelando la varianza de la forma: morfometría geométrica aplicaciones en biología evolutiva. Int. J. Morphol., 32(3), 998-1008.

BOOKSTEIN, F.L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

BUCHANAN, B. & COLLARD, M. 2010a. A geometric morphometrics-based assessment of blade shape differences among Paleoindian projectile point types from western North America. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 350-359.

CARDILLO, M. 2010. Some applications of geometric morphometrics to archaeology. In ELEWA, A.M.T. (Ed.) Morphometrics to Nonmorphometricians. Springer, 325-341.

CHARLIN, J., CARDILLO, M. & BORRAZZO, K. 2014. Spatial Patterns in Late Holocene Lithic Projectile Point Technology of Tierra del Fuego (Southern South America): Assessing Size and Shape Changes. World Archaeology 46 (1), 78-100.

EERKENS, J.W. & LIPO, C.P. 2007. Cultural transmission theory and the archaeological record: providing context to understanding variation and temporal changes in material culture. Journal of Archaeological Research, 15(3), 239-274.

OKUMURA, M. & ARAUJO, A.G.M. 2014. A Long-term cultural stability in hunter-gatherers: a case study using traditional and geometric morphometrics of lithic stemmed bifacial points from Southern Brazil. Journal of Archaeological Science, 45, 59-71.

OKUMURA, M. & ARAUJO, A.G.M. 2016. The Southern Divide: Testing morphological differences among bifacial points from Southern and South-eastern Brazil using geometric morphometrics. Journal of Lithic Studies, vol. 3, nr. 1, 107-131.

PEDROSO DE ARAUJO, R. 2018. Por uma abordagem geoarqueológica: a interface entre a Arqueologia e as Ciências da Terra e a ênfase no contexto espacial, Cadernos do LEPAARQ (UFPEL), 29, vol. 15, 20-39. [En ligne :].

SMITH, H.L., KUZMINSKY, S.C. & LINDERHOLM, A. 2020. Discerning Dispersals along the Pacific and Interior Corridors: Contributions of Geometric Morphometrics to the Peopling of the Americas. PaleoAmerica6(1), 109-130.

VILLALOBOS-LEIVA, A. & BENÍTEZ, H. A. 2020. Morfometría geométrica y sus nuevas aplicaciones en ecología y biología evolutiva. Parte 2. International Journal of Morphology, 38(6), 1818-1836.

VISCOSI, V. & CARDINI, A. 2011. Leaf morphology, taxonomy and geometric morphometrics: a simplified protocol for beginners. PLoS One 6, 25630.

ZELDITCH, M.L., SWIDERSKI, D.L., SHEETS, D.H. & FINK, W.L. 2012. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: a Primer. Elsevier, Academic Press, New York.

Dans la même collection

Sur le même thème