Canal-U

Mon compte
Site Pouchet du CNRS

Improvising Interaction


Copier le code pour partager la vidéo :
<div style="position:relative;padding-bottom:56.25%;padding-top:10px;height:0;overflow:hidden;"><iframe src="https://www.canal-u.tv/video/site_pouchet_cnrs/embed.1/improvising_interaction.20258?width=100%&amp;height=100%" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height: 100%;" width="550" height="306" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen scrolling="no"></iframe></div> Si vous souhaitez partager une séquence, indiquez le début de celle-ci , et copiez le code : h m s
Auteur(s) :
HEALEY Patrick

Producteur Canal-U :
Site Pouchet du CNRS
Contacter le contributeur
J’aime
Imprimer
partager facebook twitter Google +

Improvising Interaction

Even the most tightly scripted solo performances involve improvisation; the detailed execution of each note or word cannot be completely determined in advance. In joint performances the challenge of co­ordinating the actions of multiple people in real­time becomes even more complex. One response to this challenge has involved appeal to prediction using ‘forward models’ from computational models of action planning. These models involve automatic activation of motor representations of the future perceptual consequences of an unfolding action. Although normally associated with action production, if a person perceiving the action can also produce a forward model they can predict what word or note will come next. An important problem with this approach is that it is by definition conservative. It only works for familiar or rehearsed actions and cannot account for the production of novel or improvised responses. Using case studies from free jazz improvisation and conversation I will illustrate this problem for natural co­ordinated action. Rather than relying on access to pre­established shared representations, constructive engagement in these situations requires mechanisms that enable people to adapt and create new conventions on the fly i.e. improvise. I will argue that the key processes through which this is achieved are the interactional processes of ‘repair’ that we use to detect and deal with things that do not go as expected. These mechanisms are not auxiliary but rather provide the fundamental foundations on which all successful human interaction depends.

 

commentaires


Ajouter un commentaire Lire les commentaires
*Les champs suivis d’un astérisque sont obligatoires.
Aucun commentaire sur cette vidéo pour le moment (les commentaires font l’objet d’une modération)
 

Dans la même collection

 Joint Improvisation Meetings 2015
 “Improvising together” Debate
 Improvising in Sign Language and Gestures
 There could be ten seconds where everyone is connected and you feel really joined by the same thread and it’s really magical
 Acting together without planning ahead?
 Deconstructing “joint improvisation”
 Carrying the Feeling
 "Beneficial JI" Debate
 “Beneficial JI” - Short talk 2.3: Rachel-Shlmoit Brezis - Testing the limits – and potential of joint improvisation: Motor skills, social skills and interpersonal synchronization in adults with autism spectrum disorders
 “Beneficial JI” - Short talk 2.2: Julien Laroche - Being together when time is improvised: interactive coordination in pedagogical improvisations
 “Beneficial JI” - Short talk 2.1: Neta Spiro - Joint improvisation in music therapy: characterising interaction in individual sessions with children with autism spectrum disorders
 How much do jazz improvisers share understanding with each other and with their listeners?
 Operationalizing Social Neuroscience through HumanHuman and HumanMachine Interactions
 From me and you to we: how our brain integrates our actions and emotions when we interact
 Going into the unknown in science and art
 Joint Improvisation in Music and Dance: Some Preliminary Phenomenological Considerations on Improvisation as an Enactive Process
 “Quantifying JI” Short talk 1.4 Debate.
 “Quantifying JI” Short talk 1.3: Ashley Walton - Musical Improvisation: Spatiotemporal patterns of coordination
 “Quantifying JI” Short talk 1.2: Tommi Himberg - Mirroring improvised hand movements in a dyad
 “Quantifying JI” Short talk 1.1: Saul Albert - Extemporary movement: an interactional account of partner dance improvisation
 Brain to Brain approaches to joint actions
FMSH
 
Facebook Twitter Google+
Mon Compte