Conférence
Notice
Langue :
Anglais
Crédits
Claire SARAZIN (Réalisation), Université Toulouse-Jean Jaurès-campus Mirail (Production), SCPAM / Université Toulouse-Jean Jaurès-campus Mirail (Publication)
Conditions d'utilisation
Tous droits réservés aux auteurs et à l'Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès.
DOI : 10.60527/geyp-1q64
Citer cette ressource :
UT2J. (2017, 20 juin). Transfer and derivational complexity in the wh-movement of heritage speakers and L2 learners: A bidirectional study / Holger Hopp , in Bilinguisme contre monolinguisme : une nouvelle perspective sur les limites de l'acquisition de L2. [Vidéo]. Canal-U. https://doi.org/10.60527/geyp-1q64. (Consultée le 6 décembre 2024)
Logo de l'Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès
Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès
S'abonner
Contacter

Transfer and derivational complexity in the wh-movement of heritage speakers and L2 learners: A bidirectional study / Holger Hopp

Réalisation : 20 juin 2017 - Mise en ligne : 15 février 2018
  • document 1 document 2 document 3
  • niveau 1 niveau 2 niveau 3
Descriptif

Transfer and derivational complexity in the wh-movement of heritage speakers and L2 learners: A bidirectional study / Holger Hopp, in colloque "Bilingualism vs. monolingualism: a new perspective on limitations to L2 acquisition" organisé par la laboratoire Octogone-Lordat (Université Toulouse 2) sous la responsabilité de Barbara Köpke (UT2J), Holger Hopp (Technische Universität Braunschweig), Tanja Kupisch (Universität Konstanz), Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, 19-20 juin 2017.

Ina comparative study of heritage L1 and late L2 acquisition, we investigate theproduction and comprehension of filler-gap dependencies in Plautdietsch(Mennonite Low German) and English by Plautdietsch-English bilinguals. Previousresearch shows that complex (i.e. cross-clausal) wh- dependencies pose more difficulty to child L1 and adult L2learners than monoclausal dependencies (Jakubowicz and Strik 2008, Schulz 2011,Slavkov 2014). To avoid complex dependencies, learners often license medialconstructions where the wh-itemsurfaces once at the left periphery of the embedded CP and a second time at theleft periphery of the matrix clause, as illustrated by (1) and (2).

(1)  What do you think where she put the book?                     (medial scope-marking)

(2)  Where do you think where she put the book?                   (copy)

Medial-wh is ungrammatical in English, thoughpossible in (Low) German. In thispaper, we investigate whether medial-wh inheritage and L2 speakers is due to cross-linguistic transfer orgrammar-internal complexity reduction according to the Derivational ComplexityHypothesis (DCH; Jakubowicz, 2005). Our study presents a comparison of fluentL1 speakers of Plautdietsch, a Germanic variety spoken by Mennonites around theworld. We compare two groups within the same population, i.e. six speakers withPlautdietsch as L1 who learntEnglish late, and six speakers who have Plautdietsch as a heritage language andacquired English early. All speakers performed a production task that elicited833 long-distance, embedded, and matrix questions in both languages in total.Subsequently, they completed an acceptability judgment task on 144 questions inPlautdietsch and English. In productionand comprehension, all speakers clearly differentiated between languages inmatrix and embedded questions. For long-distance wh-questions, we found an interaction of group and language: InEnglish, only late learners produced medial constructions in the L2; inPlautdietsch, only heritage speakers produce medial- wh in their L1. This pattern cannot be due to transfer sincespeakers/groups produce medial-wh inonly one of their languages. Instead, medial-wh surfaces as a mechanism to reduce syntactic complexity in theless dominant language, irrespective of whether it is the L1 or the L2 orwhether it was acquired early or late. These group differences partially extendto comprehension. We argue that the DCH can account for grammaticalrestructuring in both heritage L1 speakers and late L2 speakers and discuss itspotential as a metric of incomplete acquisition and attrition in bilingual syntax.

Thème
Disciplines :
Documentation

Caloi, Irene (2017). Additive focus particles in German-speaking learners of Italian as L2. In De Cesare, A. M., Andorno, C. M., Focus on additivity. Multiperspective and multifaceted views, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 237-263.

Hernandez, Arturo E. (2009). Language switching in the bilingual brain: What's next?, Brain & Language, 109, 133-140.

Hofweber, Julia (2016). Effects of dense code-switching on executive control, in Irina A. Sekerina and Lauren Spradlin, "Bilingualism and Executive Function: An interdisciplinary approach", Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5, vol.6, 648–668.

Hopp, Holger & Schmid, Monika S. (2014). L'accent étranger perçu dans l'attrition L1 et l'acquisition de L2: l'impact de l'âge d'acquisition et du bilinguisme / Perceived foreign accent in L1 attrition and L2 acquisition, Psycholinguistique appliquée, 34 (2), 361-394. [En ligne : http://www.let.rug.nl/languageattrition/Papers/Hopp%20&%20Schmid%20forthc.pdf].

Kartushina, N., Frauenfelder, U. H. and Golestani, N. (2016), How and When Does the Second Language Influence the Production of Native Speech Sounds: A Literature Review, Language Learning, 52, vol. 66, 155–186. [En ligne : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lang.12187/full].

Köpke, Barbara, Schmid, Monika (2011). L’attrition de la première langue en tant que phénomène psycholinguistique, Langage, Interaction and Acquisition / Language, Interaction et Acquisition (LIA), Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, numéro spécial 2, vol. 2, 185-196.

Kupisch, T. (2012). Thèmes génériques en italien des premiers bilingues germano. Bilinguisme: Langue et Cognition 15 (4), 736-756.

Massa, E., Cortelazzo, F., El Yagoubi, R. & Köpke, B. (2016). Bilinguisme et contrôle exécutif : exploration neurofonctionnelle au moyen des méthodes potentiels évoqués et IRMf, Revue de Neuropsychologie, 2, 8, 126-136. {En ligne : http://www.jle.com/fr/revues/nrp/e-docs/bilinguisme_et_controle_executif_exploration_neurofonctionnelle_au_moyen_des_methodes_potentiels_evoques_et_irmf_307476/article.phtml].

Meisel, J. (2001). The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages. Early differenciation and subsequent development of grammars, in J. Cenoz & F. Genesee (éds.), Trends in Bilingual Acquisition, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 11-41.

Meisel, J. (1989). Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children, in K. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (eds.), Bilingualism Across the Lifespan : Aspects of Acquisition, Maturity, and Loss, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 13-40.

Paradis, M. (2007). L1 attrition features predicted by a neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism, in B. Köpke, M. S. Schmid, M. Keijzer & S. Dostert (éds.), Language Attrition. Theoretical perspectives, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 121-133.

Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Pirvulescu, M., & Roberge, Y. (2011). Topicalization and object omission in child language. First Language, 3, 31, 280-299. [En ligne : http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0142723710394384].

Royle, Phaedra, St-Denis, Ariane, Mazzocca, Patrizia, Marquis, Alexandra (2017). Insensitivity to verb conjugation patterns in French children with SLI, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. [En ligne : https://eoa.umontreal.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2017/07/publicationsRoyleP_verbConjugationPatternsFrenchSLI.pdf].

Rvache, S., Royle, P., Gonnerman, L. M., Stanké, B., Marquis, A., Herbay, A. (2017). Development of a Tool to Screen Risk of Literacy Delays in French-Speaking Children: PHOPHLO, Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology (CJSLPA), 3, vol. 41, 321-340. [En ligne : http://www.cjslpa.ca/detail.php?ID=1220&lang=en].

Sabourin, L. (2014). The bilingual advantage in the Stroop task: simultaneous vs. early bilinguals, in "L3 Acquisition: A Focus on Cognitive Approaches", Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, vol. 18, 350-355.

Schmid, M.S. & Köpke, B. (2017). The relevance of first language attrition to theories of bilingual development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6, vol. 7,  637 –667 [En ligne : http://www.let.rug.nl/languageattrition/Papers/Schmid&Kopke2017.pdf].

Schmid, M S., Köpke, B., De Bot, K. (2013). Language attrition as a complex, non-linear development, International Journal of Bilingualism, 17 (6), 675-682.

Stoehr, A., Benders, T., Van Hell, J., & Fikkert, P. (2017). Heritage language exposure impacts voice onset time of Dutch–German simultaneous bilingual preschoolers, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1-20. [En ligne : doi: 10.1017/S1366728917000116].

Stöhr, A., Akpınar, D., Bianchi, G., & Kupisch, T. (2012). Gender marking in L2 learners and Italian-German bilinguals with German as the weaker language, in K. Braunmueller & C. Gabriel (eds.), Multilingual Individuals Multilingual Societies,  153–170.

Van Osch, B. A., Aalberse, S. P., Hulk, A. C. J., & Sleeman, A. P. (2017). Knowledge of mood in internal and external interface contexts in Spanish heritage speakers in the Netherlands, in K. Bellamy, M. Child, M. C. Parafita Couto, P. González, & A. Muntendam (eds.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone World,  Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 67-94.

Le site internet dédié au colloque "Bilinguisme vs. monolinguisme: une nouvelle perspective par rapport à la question des limites de l’acquisition d’une L2" (Univ. Toulouse Jean Jaurès
19-20 juin 2017)

Dans la même collection

Voir tout

Sur le même thème